Our research lies at the intersection between Ecology and Evolution. We aim at addressing the short-term evolutionary changes in populations, in ecologically-relevant scenarios. We use spider mites as a research model, tiny spider-like arthropods that cause severe damage to several crop plants (tomato, bean, cucumber, citrus, strawberry, etc). We use a combination of behavioural and ecological lab experiments, coupled with field sampling and Experimental Evolution, which allows following the evolutionary trajectories of populations in real time.
The evolution of competition among herbivores
Team: Diogo, Maud, André
The spider mites Tetranychus urticae and T. evansi co-occur on tomato. This plant can accumulate different amounts of cadmium in its aerial parts, creating a heterogeneous environment for the mites. We are investigating the consequences of this heterogeneity for the outcome of competition, and how it interacts with other ecological factors such as plant defences. This information will allow testing how evolution in different environments affects intra and interspecific competition in spider mites.
The ecological consequences of plant-mite interactions
Team: Jéssica, Diogo
Whereas T. urticae induces plant defences, as most herbivores, T. evansi suppresses these defences on tomato. We are studying whether this ability is modified by the environment or by the evolutionary history of the mites.
Intraspecific variation, genetic correlations and species coexistence
Team: Maud, Jorge, André, Leonor, Miguel, Flore
Intraspecific trait variation and their correlation may affect the ecology and evolution of species coexistence. We are addressing (a) the potential correlation between variation in growth rates and carrying capacity, among reproductive traits and between behavioural and life-history traits (in spiders); (b) how individual variation in reproductive interference, niche width and in defence manipulation affects species coexistence.
Team: Flore, Miguel, Leonor
Wolbachia is arguably the most common bacterial reproductive manipulator in arthropods. We are investigating its effects on spider-mite reproduction and mating strategies, as well as the factors (e.g. host plants, pesticide resistance or pathogens of spider mites) that affect its interactions with the host. We are also addressing how such factors affect the distribution of Wolbachia and that of other endosymbiotic bacteria in natural spider-mite populations.
Team: Miguel, Flore
Spider mite species/populations exhibit different degrees of reproductive isolation. We are testing how different factors, such as endosymbionts, ecological specialization (i.e. host plant use), reproductive interference and competition affect isolation patterns. Conversely, we are addressing how reproductive isolation affects the outcome of competition and the likelihood of coexistence.
Team: Leonor, Joao
In spider mites, the first male sires virtually all the offspring. However, spider mites still mate multiply. We are investigating this paradox from several angles, from the mechanistic basis of mate recognition to the eco-evolutionary implications of first male precedence.
Santos, A.M.C., Cianciaruso, M.V., Barbosa, A.M., Bini, L.M., Diniz-Filho, J.A.F., Faleiro, F.V., Gouveia, S.F., Loyola, R., Medina, N.G., Rangel, T.F., Tessarolo, G. & Hortal, J. (2020) Current climate, but also long‐term climate changes and human impacts, determine the geographic distribution of European mammal diversity.Global Ecology and Biogeography, 29(10), 1758-1769. DOI:10.1111/geb.13148 (IF2019 6,446; Q1 Ecology)
Zelé, F., Santos, I., Matos, M., Vavre, F., Weill, M. & Magalhães, S. (2020) Endosymbiont diversity in natural populations of Tetranychus mites is rapidly lost under laboratory conditions.Heredity, 124, 603-617. DOI:10.1038/s41437-020-0297-9 (IF2019 3,436; Q1 Ecology)
Zélé, F., Altıntas, M., Santos, I., Cakmak, I. & Magalhães, S. (2020) Inter-and intra-specific variation of spider mite susceptibility to fungal infections: implications for the long-term success of biological control.Ecology and Evolution, 10(7), 3209-3221. DOI:10.1002/ece3.5958 (IF2019 2,392; Q2 Ecology)